News and Articles

Category Archives: FINRA News

David Charles Burke (Omaha, Nebraska)

May 30, 2024 – An AWC was issued in which Burke was barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities. Without admitting or denying the findings, Burke consented to the sanction and to the entry of findings that he refused to appear for on-the-record testimony requested by FINRA in connection with its investigation into the circumstances giving rise to a Form U5 filed by his member firm. The findings stated that the Form U5 disclosed that Burke had been discharged after an affiliate property/casualty company terminated his contract for applying electronic and wet signatures on several property/casualty insurance forms without the consent or knowledge of the insured. (FINRA Case #2023080266701)

Harmed investors can call (954) 693-7577 or email [email protected] to discuss their legal options. All consultations are free and confidential.   Most cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning that clients are not obligated to pay attorney fees unless money is recovered on their behalf.

Thrivent Investment Management Inc.

May 28, 2024 – An AWC was issued in which the firm was censured, fined $325,000, and required to certify that it has remediated the issues identified in the AWC and implemented a reasonably designed supervisory system, including WSPs. Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that it failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system reasonably designed to detect possible instances of signature forgery or falsification. The findings stated that firm registered representatives electronically signed customer names on documents, including documents that were required books and records of the firm. The firm’s WSPs required representatives to obtain authentic customer signatures on firm documents. However, the firm’s WSPs did not include any procedure to supervise use of electronic signatures or provide reasonable guidance to supervisors on what they should look for in attempting to assess whether an electronic signature was genuine. As a result, the firm did not reasonably investigate certain red flags contained in the certificates of completion, such as instances where representatives sent a document from their work email address to an email address not recorded in the customer’s account information such as their personal email address, sent an authentication code to their own cell phone number, or instances where the representative and customer’s remote signatures were sent from the same IP address. The firm failed to detect that certain of its representatives sent documents requiring a customer’s electronic signature to their own personal and work email addresses, and corresponding authorization codes to their own phones, and then falsified or forged customer electronic signatures on firm documents. The falsifications and forgeries were not in furtherance of unauthorized activity, there was no customer harm, and no customer complained.  (FINRA Case #2023079075201)

Harmed investors can call (954) 693-7577 or email [email protected] to discuss their legal options. All consultations are free and confidential.   Most cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning that clients are not obligated to pay attorney fees unless money is recovered on their behalf.

Ariel A. Rivero (Miami, Florida)

May 13, 2024 – An AWC was issued in which Rivero was fined $15,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member in all capacities for six months. Without admitting or denying the findings, Rivero consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that he caused his member firm to maintain incomplete books and records by using an instant messaging application to communicate with firm customers regarding securities-related business. The findings stated that the instant messaging application was not an approved channel for electronic communications with customers, and as a result, the firm did not capture or maintain these communications. The messages included, among other things, obtaining authorization to buy and sell stocks, discussions about account performance, and discussions related to a customer complaint and a customer loan. In addition, Rivero falsely attested that he did not use unapproved messaging services for business related communications. The findings also stated that Rivero borrowed $500,000 from a firm customer without providing prior written notice to, or obtaining written approval from, the firm. The customer was not an immediate family member or a financial institution. Rivero has repaid the customer more than half of the amount he borrowed and he is current on his payments on the loan. The findings also included that Rivero attempted to settle a customer complaint without notifying his firm. The customer, who was also Rivero’s former brother-in-law, complained to Rivero about losses in his account from investments in non-traditional exchange traded funds. Rivero offered, via the instant messaging application, to reimburse the customer over $300,000 in monthly installments of $10,000 to resolve the complaint. Rivero did not disclose to his firm the customer’s complaint or his attempt to settle with the customer. However, Rivero did not reach a settlement agreement with the customer or make any payments to him. Ultimately, the customer filed an arbitration claim against the firm and Rivero. The firm later settled the customer’s complaint.

Harmed investors can call (954) 693-7577 or email [email protected] to discuss their legal options. All consultations are free and confidential.   Most cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning that clients are not obligated to pay attorney fees unless money is recovered on their behalf.

 

Jesse Aaron Bray (Orlando, Florida)

May 10, 2024 – An AWC was issued in which Bray was barred from association with any FINRA member in all capacities. Without admitting or denying the findings, Bray consented to the sanction and to the entry of findings that he refused to appear for on-the-record testimony requested by FINRA in connection with its investigation into a disclosure reflected in a Form U4 amendment filed by his member firm reporting that he was charged with a felony. (FINRA Case #2023080242101)

Harmed investors can call (954) 693-7577 or email [email protected] to discuss their legal options. All consultations are free and confidential.   Most cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning that clients are not obligated to pay attorney fees unless money is recovered on their behalf.

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated

May 9, 2024 – An AWC was issued in which the firm was censured, fined $825,000, and required to certify that it has remediated the issues identified in the AWC and implemented a reasonably designed supervisory system, including WSPs. Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that it failed to reasonably supervise the execution timeliness of customer orders. The findings stated that the firm’s supervisory system, including its WSPs, was not reasonably designed in so far as the firm only reviewed the execution timeliness of orders processed through the firm’s electronic order systems from the time the orders were routed to a market center for further handling or execution and the final execution time. The firm did not conduct a supervisory review of how long it took the firm’s electronic order systems to process and route the orders to a market center. By omitting the electronic order systems’ order handling time from order receipt to the route time to a market center from its supervisory reviews, the firm failed to reasonably supervise whether it made every effort to execute marketable customer orders that it received fully and promptly. The findings also stated that the firm failed to reasonably supervise the accuracy of memoranda for electronic orders. The firm’s supervisory system, including its WSPs, was not reasonably designed to achieve compliance with SEC and FINRA recordkeeping requirements in so far as the firm did not conduct supervisory reviews to ensure the accuracy of information recorded on its order memoranda for retail brokerage equity orders the firm received electronically. (FINRA Case #2017054488401)

Harmed investors can call (954) 693-7577 or email [email protected] to discuss their legal options. All consultations are free and confidential.   Most cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning that clients are not obligated to pay attorney fees unless money is recovered on their behalf.

Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.

May 7, 2024 – An AWC was issued in which the firm was censured and fined $500,000. Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that it failed to reasonably supervise transactions that its registered representatives placed directly with product sponsors on behalf of firm customers (i.e., direct business transactions or held away securities transactions). The findings stated that the firm did not take steps reasonably designed to ensure that direct business transactions appeared on 5 Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions July 2024 the firm’s daily trade blotter, causing the firm to fail to run transactions, including dividend reinvestments, for customers through exception reports used to identify potential sales practice violations, including potentially unsuitable transactions. The firm also failed to ensure that it collected information for customers’ investment profiles, such as the customers’ ages, investment time horizons, and liquidity needs, that was relevant for making certain suitability determinations. Subsequently, the firm revised its WSPs to prohibit direct transactions with mutual fund companies unless a corresponding account has been established at the firm. The firm also instituted procedures to verify that each direct business mutual fund transaction is housed in a firm account or, if not, to require representatives to promptly obtain a new account application and open an account for the customer. The firm also established progressive discipline measures if representatives failed to obtain new account applications. Ultimately, the firm began a retrospective review of its direct business transactions during the relevant period. That review involved identifying the direct business transactions that the firm failed to include on its trade blotter and reviewing the transactions according to the parameters used by the firm’s exception reporting system. The firm attempted to collect missing information about customers’ investment profiles. The suitability of certain of the transactions could not be determined because the firm was unable to collect complete information at the time of the retrospective review about customers’ investment profiles, including their investment time horizons or liquidity needs that would have been relevant at the time of the purchase. (FINRA Case #2017052438501).

Harmed investors can call (954) 693-7577 or email [email protected] to discuss their legal options. All consultations are free and confidential.   Most cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning that clients are not obligated to pay attorney fees unless money is recovered on their behalf.

 

FINRA Fined Center Street Securities for GPB Capital Fund Sales

On December 29, 2022, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority fined Nashville based, Center Street Securities, Inc., for improperly selling GPB Capital Holding private placements.  According to FINRA, Center Street Securities failed to inform nearly 20 investors that GPB had failed to submit its required filings with the SEC.

According to the Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, filed by FINRA, Center Street “negligently failed” to tell 20 investors in two offerings related to GPB Capital Holdings LLC, that the issuer failed to make timely required filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Per FINRA, in connection with these 20 sales, Center Street representatives did not inform the customers that the partnerships in question, Automotive Portfolio and Holdings II had not timely filed their audited financial statements with the SEC or the reasons for the delay. The delay in filing audited financial statements and the reasons for it was material information that should have been disclosed.   Between May 4, 2018, and June 29, 2018, Center Street sold limited partnership interests.  The principal value of those 20 sales, totaled $1,206,000.  These transactions generated $98,727.50 in commissions.   By negligent omitting material facts, Center Street violated FINRA rules.

In settling this matter, Center Street Securities neither admitted nor denied the charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA’s findings.  Center Street Securities, agreed to a public censure and to pay a $70,000 fine and partial restitution of $89,652.50.

If you have not hired an attorney and wish to discuss any securities related question, please contact David A. Weintraub, P.A., 7805 SW 6th Court, Plantation, FL  33324.  By phone: 954.693.7577 or 800.718.1422.

Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Fined and Order to Pay Restitution to Customers Affected by its Failure to Supervise

On November 21, 2022 FINRA censured Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC for its failure to supervise nine registered representatives who recommended potentially high risk securities to their customers.  The firm previously paid restitution to some of the customers who suffered losses as a result of its conduct.   FINRA ordered Morgan Stanley to pay restitution to the remaining customers.

From January 2014 through December 2018, Morgan Stanley failed to reasonably supervise nine registered representatives who recommended potentially high-risk securities to their customers in violation of the firm’s Plan of Solicitation policy.  Each of the nine representatives recommended that customers purchase securities in quantities that were subject to Morgan Stanley’s pre-approval requirement but did not complete a Plan of Solicitation.    The investigation revealed that Morgan Stanley received alerts that some of its registered representatives had made hundreds of recommendations that violated the firm’s Plan of Solicitation policy. The firm’s procedures require that a supervisor at the firm review and approve the Plan of Solicitation prior to the representative recommending the security. Each of the representatives recommended that customers purchase securities in quantities that were subject to the firm’s pre-approval requirement but did not complete a Plan of Solicitation.  Some of the recommended securities were high risk and inconsistent with certain of their customers’ moderate or conservative risk tolerances. The firm did not take appropriate action in response to alerts that its representatives had violated its own policies.  In particular, the firm did not evaluate whether the recommendations were consistent with the customers’ investment profiles. These customers incurred realized losses as a result of many of the recommended trades. Subsequently, the firm improved its enforcement of the Plan of Solicitation policy, including by directing review of Plan of Solicitation alerts to a central review unit.

 

Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm consented to the entry of findings that it failed to reasonably supervise registered representatives who recommended potentially high-risk securities to their customers in violation of the firm’s Plan of Solicitation policy.  Morgan Stanley was fined $200,000.00 and required to pay $497,897, plus interest in restitution to affected customers.

Harmed investors can call (800) 718-1422 or email [email protected] to discuss their legal options. All consultations are free and confidential.   Most cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning that clients are not obligated to pay attorney fees unless money is recovered on their behalf.

 

Registered Representative, Douglas F. Kaiser Fined, and Suspended in Relation to his Failure to Supervise US Treasury Securities Transactions

On November 11, 2022, FINRA sanctioned Douglas Fulton Kaiser of Boca Raton, Florida.  Kaiser, who is registered with Westpark Capital Inc., was fined $5,000.00 and suspended from association with any FINRA member in any principal capacity for three months.  In addition, he is required to attend and satisfactorily complete twenty hours of continuing education concerning supervision.  The sanctions stemmed from failing to supervise WestPark’s markups and markdowns for US Treasury securities.

Through the investigation, FINRA learned that Kaiser was the supervisor of WestPark’s fixed-income trading desk while a representative, who was recommending an unsuitable investment strategy characterized by the active, short-term trading of U.S. Treasury securities and charging excessive markups on certain transactions involving U.S. Treasury securities was registered at the firm. In his role, Kaiser was responsible for reviewing markups and markdowns on fixed-income transactions. For eight customers who suffered losses due to the representative’s Treasury-trading strategy, the representative charged, and Kaiser approved, markups or markdowns more than the firm’s policies allowed.   Kaiser failed to recognize and respond appropriately to the elevated markups and markdowns.  Moreover, for five of the eight customers, Kaiser miscalculated the markdowns the representative charged for certain sales on one day. Those sales were part of a group of same-day sales followed by purchases the following day that collectively amounted to “proceeds” transactions.

Without admitting or denying the findings, Kaiser consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that he failed to supervise his member firm’s markups and markdowns for U.S. Treasury securities. The suspension is in effect from December 5, 2022, through March 4, 2023.

Harmed investors can call (800) 718-1422 or email [email protected] to discuss their legal options. All consultations are free and confidential.   Most cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning that clients are not obligated to pay attorney fees unless money is recovered on their behalf.

FINRA Fined Wedbush Securities Inc., Due to its Misrepresentation In Connection with Certain Corporate and Municipal Bonds Interest or Principal Payments

On November 3, 2022, FINRA censured Wedbush Securities Inc., fined the firm $850,000, and required it to certify that the firm’s WSPs and supervisory system are reasonably designed to review the accuracy of account statements sent to customers and to achieve compliance with its obligation to deliver to customers annual privacy notices, margin disclosures, and order execution disclosures.

From January 2013 through December 2018, Wedbush negligently misrepresented on monthly account statements that it sent to approximately 610 customers that certain corporate and municipal bonds were making interest or principal payments when, in fact, the bonds were in default.  The investigation stated that the firm failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system reasonably designed to review the accuracy of account statements it sent to customers. Although the firm received notice when bonds held by customers had defaulted, it did not have any system to verify that such information was reflected in the system the firm used to maintain information about securities held by customers.  In addition, from January 2010 through August 2020, Wedbush failed to deliver to a total of approximately 14,900 customers three types of annual notices and disclosures required by FINRA and SEC rules.  The notices were available on the firm’s website. FINRA found that the firm did not have a supervisory system reasonably designed to achieve compliance with its obligation to deliver annual privacy notices, order execution disclosures, and margin disclosures. The firm’s WSPs required the firm to deliver the privacy notices, order execution disclosures, and margin disclosures to customers on an annual basis. However, the firm did not have any system to verify that such notices were sent to customers who elected to receive materials from the firm via its online platform. Instead, the firm relied on its vendor to deliver these required annual notices and disclosures to customers, but the firm did not take any steps to verify that its vendor had appended the required notices and disclosures to the account statements sent electronically to customers. Ultimately, the firm identified that customers had not been receiving the required notices and disclosures, implemented changes in its delivery process, and self-reported the issue to FINRA.  Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that it negligently misrepresented the default status of bonds on customer account statements.

Harmed investors can call (800) 718-1422 or email [email protected] to discuss their legal options. All consultations are free and confidential.   Most cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, meaning that clients are not obligated to pay attorney fees unless money is recovered on their behalf.